In the previous two articles, we looked at the false charge that the resurrection of Christ was borrowed from pagan myths. We saw in the first article that there were many fallacies in this theory, and we provided rebuttal for specific charges of myth-borrowing in part 2 of this series. Now we want to look briefly at the unique character of the death and resurrection of Christ to show how it makes no logical sense for it to have been borrowed from any pagan mythology.
And I would add, Jesus’ bodily resurrection was a totally foreign concept to all pagan notions of life after death.
The theory that Christ’s resurrection was borrowed from pagan myths is itself a huge myth. It’s time that this theory was given its own death and burial.